Should Arsenal sell Aubameyang in January? A case for and against.
Should Arsenal sell Aubameyang in January? A case for and against.
By Jonny Bray
What a difference a year can make.
If you’d asked most Arsenal fans what area of the pitch the Gunners were strongest in at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, they’d almost certainly say striker.
But it’s a different story now, with Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang seemingly past his prime and Alexandre Lacazette increasingly depicted more as a meme than a footballer online.
This begs the question, should Arsenal sell Aubameyang this January?
For
Aubameyang looks finished.
Arsenal have improved in every area of the pitch over the last 18 months, but they’ve been badly let down by their strikers.
Between joining the Gunners in January 2018 and the end of the 2019-20 season, the Gabon international scored 54 times in 85 games.
However, he has found the back of the net just 14 times in 43 league appearances since.
And to make matters worse, his form is still declining, with goals becoming harder and harder to come by as the season progresses.
Another reason now is the time to sell the striker is that we may never get another chance to make some money from his sale.
Aubameyang signed a new contract during September 2020, meaning he still has most of his three-year deal left.
Furthermore, at 32 years old, the forward’s re-sale value is declining year on year.
Finally, there is a clear and obvious option for his long-term replacement, Dominic Calvert-Lewin.
The English international may be a very different player to Aubameyang, but he fits the profile of Mikel Arteta’s previous signings perfectly.
Young, English, and with plenty of time at the highest level left in the tank, Calvert-Lewin could be a star at the Emirates.
If they sell Aubameyang and move quickly, then the Gunners could secure his signature.
Against
Despite not being in excellent form, selling Aubameyang isn’t as clear cut a decision as it seems.
There are several reasons why Arsenal should wait to move the forward on to his next club.
Firstly, the likelihood of signing his long-term replacement in January is significantly lower than if they looked to replace him in the summer.
Even if Arteta can entice a Calvert-Lewin or striker of similar quality to North London, signing in him in January would still be bad business.
The transfer fee are typically higher, the wages too and there is an increased risk of a transfer falling through, and the Gunners being left without a striker.
Then there’s the hope that, in the right circumstances, Aubameyang could return to his best form.
His departure from Borussia Dortmund means we know that the forward can be challenging to deal with on his way out.
He even apologised to the fans of the German club after throwing a hissy fit in an attempt to leave.
This shows that it could just be a case of getting him back on side.
Obviously, this is easier said than done, but the Gunners would be a formidable side if they were able to get Aubameyang’s toys back in the pram.
Conclusion
Frankly, Aubameyang has had his chance.
The first half of this season was, in my opinion, an excellent opportunity for the striker to show that he still has a lot to offer Arteta and his side.
But sadly, it’s not meant to be.
Despite a difficult end to his time at the club, leaving now could be what is best for Aubameyang and Arsenal both in the short and long term.
The longer he stays, the more damage is done to his legacy at the club.
And crucially, Arsenal will want to take advantage of an improving midfield and defence by getting a red-hot goal scorer to lead the line.
Photo Credit: Getty Images